This page exists for one reason.
To track the claims that get repeated the most, while evidence stays missing.
If the evidence exists, someone will claim the money.
Until then, this is the list.
The Zero Proof List: The Claims That Keep Getting Repeated
These items are not here because they are “interesting.” They are here because they are popular.
They show up in memes, podcasts, comment sections, and videos over and over.
But when you ask for primary evidence that can be verified, you get the same answers.
“It is out there.”
“Do your own research.”
“I saw a clip once.”
That does not meet the standard.
How to read this list
- Repeated claim means it shows up widely across multiple large accounts and platforms.
- Zero proof means no submission has provided verifiable primary evidence that independent reviewers can confirm.
- Items remain listed until a submission meets the site’s evidence standards and survives review.
If you want the site standard in one place, start with How We Verify, then use Evidence vs Rumors and Chain of Custody Checklist.
The top repeat offenders
1. “Dominion switched votes”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Repeated constantly. Usually supported by screenshots, edited clips, or claims already rejected in court settings.
2. “Dead people voted by the thousands”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Often driven by database matching errors, misunderstanding of voter roll maintenance, or recycled lists with no chain of custody.
3. “Suitcases of ballots in Georgia”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. A case study in edited video and missing context replacing full documented procedures.
4. “Trucks of ballots crossed state lines”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Typically relies on rumor chains and unverified anecdotes.
5. “Foreign servers or satellites changed the results”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Often framed as classified or secret, which makes it unfalsifiable and non qualifying.
6. “The machines were connected to the internet and hacked”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted that proves outcome changing manipulation with documented mechanism and primary evidence.
7. “Ballot dumps at midnight prove fraud”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Usually confusion about how reporting works versus how counting works.
8. “Thousands of illegal ballots were counted”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Often stated vaguely without a testable claim tied to records.
9. “Fake ballots were printed and shipped in”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted. Usually presented with zero chain of custody and no source documentation.
10. “Courts refused to look at the evidence”
Status: No verifiable proof submitted that courts blocked outcome changing evidence. This claim often ignores procedural failures and the difference between allegations and admissible evidence.
What would remove an item from the list
One thing. A submission that meets the evidence standard and survives review.
That means:
- A single sentence claim that is testable
- Primary evidence with chain of custody
- A clear method so independent reviewers can verify it
- Proof that the evidence actually supports the claim
If you think you have proof, start here: 10K Truth Challenge.
Why this page matters
Because repetition is not proof.
Popularity is not proof.
Confidence is not proof.
And “I have not seen it” is not proof.
Reality does not care how many times a claim gets shared. Reality only cares what you can show.
Submit evidence if you have it
If you think any item here is wrong, that is simple to fix.
Submit verifiable evidence with primary sources and chain of custody.
If it holds up, the list changes and you can claim the money.
If you need a checklist before you submit, use 20 Questions and Evidence Standards.