This is the simplest way to explain the $10,000 Evidence Matters Truth Challenge.
If the evidence exists, someone will claim the money.
So what claims qualify, and what does not. Here is the line.
What this page is
This is the living claims list for the $10K Challenge.
It defines which claims are eligible, what kind of proof counts, and what gets rejected immediately.
The purpose is not to argue politics. The purpose is to force one standard.
Verifiable evidence.
What qualifies
A claim qualifies if it meets all three conditions.
- It is specific. A concrete allegation you can test, not a vibe.
- It is falsifiable. There is a clear way to prove it true or false.
- It is evidence based. It can be supported with primary records and chain of custody.
If a claim cannot be clearly stated, it cannot be verified. If it cannot be verified, it cannot qualify.
Eligible claim categories
These are the types of claims that qualify when they are stated clearly and tied to documents.
2020 election outcome changing fraud
- Verified ballots proven fraudulent with documented chain of custody
- Verified vote totals altered through a documented mechanism with forensic proof
- Verified illegal counting practices tied to outcome changing numbers, proven with records
Named operational conspiracies
- Specific allegations like “X system did Y in Z county on this date” with primary records
- Claims tied to known litigation where new evidence can be independently verified
Specific government misconduct claims
- Claims of bribery, coercion, or documented illegal orders when supported by primary records
- Claims supported by official reports, court findings, or verified documentation
Notice the repeated phrase. Specific. Verifiable. Documented.
What does not qualify
These get rejected.
- General suspicion. “Something felt off” is not a claim.
- Predictions. “Just wait, it is coming” is not evidence.
- Screenshots with no provenance. If the source cannot be verified, it cannot qualify.
- Anonymous “insider” stories. No chain of custody, no accountability.
- Edited clips. If the full context cannot be produced, it is not proof.
- Motives as evidence. “They would do it” is not the same as “they did it.”
- Claims that cannot be tested. “It is all classified” is an automatic no.
If you cannot show your work, you cannot claim the prize.
What proof looks like
To qualify, submissions must include primary evidence that an independent reviewer can verify.
Examples include:
- Official records with clear provenance
- Court filings and exhibits with docket links and page references
- Audit reports or certified recount documentation
- Original full length video with time, place, and chain of custody explained
- Datasets with methodology and reproducible steps
Not all documents are equal. The standard is not “a document exists.” The standard is “a document proves the claim.”
How the review works
Every submission is evaluated the same way.
- Is the claim clearly stated.
- Is the evidence primary.
- Is the chain of custody explained.
- Can independent reviewers verify it.
- Does it materially prove the claim.
If it fails any step, it does not qualify.
Bottom line
This challenge is not about winning an argument.
It is about proving a claim in a way that survives scrutiny.
If the evidence exists, someone will claim the money.
If it does not, the truth keeps the pot.