Fulton County Voting Machines: Fraud or Broken Chain of Custody?

Fulton County voting machines and the broken chain of custody

Fulton County voting machines were decertified by Pennsylvania after unauthorized third parties were allowed to access certified election equipment. MAGA-aligned sources claim the decision proves that an independent investigation uncovered evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

Claim being checked: Pennsylvania decertified Fulton County’s Dominion voting machines because investigators uncovered election fraud.

Evidence Matters verdict: Unsupported.

The records do not show that votes were changed.

They do not show that fake ballots were counted.

They do not show that Dominion voting machines stole votes.

What the records show is that Fulton County allowed outside groups to access certified election equipment. Pennsylvania officials then determined that the machines could no longer be trusted for future elections because the chain of custody had been broken.

That is not evidence of election fraud.

That is evidence contamination.

The Claim About Fulton County Voting Machines

Table of Contents

The Election Crime Bureau presents the Fulton County controversy as an established example of suspicious government behavior.

Its version of the story suggests that Pennsylvania officials retaliated against Fulton County after the county arranged an independent forensic examination of its voting equipment.

That framing leaves out the most important fact.

The Fulton County voting machines were not decertified because an investigation proved fraud.

They were decertified because unauthorized third parties had been given access to sensitive election equipment and data.

A machine being decertified does not prove that the machine changed votes.

An outside group examining election equipment does not prove that the group found fraud.

And state officials refusing to certify equipment after unauthorized access does not prove a coverup.

Why Fulton County Voting Machines Were Decertified

On July 20, 2021, Pennsylvania Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth Veronica Degraffenreid sent a letter to Fulton County officials explaining why the county’s Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5A voting system was being decertified.

According to the letter, Fulton County allowed Wake TSI to access important parts of the county’s certified election system.

The company was reportedly given access to:

The election database.
Election result files.
Windows system logs.
Complete hard drive images.
Images of USB drives used to transfer election results.

The state also said Wake TSI had no recognized knowledge or expertise in election technology.

That matters because voting systems are tested and certified under controlled conditions.

Once an unauthorized outside group gains access to the software, files, drives, or system images, election officials can no longer confirm that the equipment remains in the same secure condition it was in when certified.

That is why the Fulton County voting machines were decertified.

The Crime Scene Analogy

Imagine police collect evidence from a crime scene.

That evidence is documented, sealed, and stored under controlled conditions.

Then someone allows an outside political organization to handle it, inspect it, copy it, and take digital images of it.

If a court later rules that the evidence can no longer be trusted, that does not prove the outside group uncovered the real criminal.

It proves the chain of custody was compromised.

That is the central issue in Fulton County.

MAGA sources are treating the consequence of contamination as proof that the contamination uncovered a conspiracy.

Those are not the same thing.

What the Fulton County Story Does Not Prove

The Fulton County controversy does not prove that the 2020 election was stolen.

It does not prove that votes were flipped.

It does not prove that illegal ballots were counted.

It does not prove that Dominion changed election results.

It does not prove that Joe Biden won Pennsylvania illegally.

It proves that Fulton County allowed unauthorized outside access to certified voting equipment.

It also proves that Pennsylvania officials believed those machines could no longer be safely used in future elections.

That is a completely different claim.

Why the “Retaliation” Argument Fails

The Election Crime Bureau’s version of the story depends heavily on one loaded word: retaliation.

That word makes it sound as though state officials punished Fulton County for getting too close to the truth.

But the official record gives a direct security reason for the decision.

The machines had been accessed by an unauthorized third party.

Protecting election equipment after unauthorized access is not retaliation.

It is basic election security.

If officials continued using machines after outsiders had copied drives, accessed databases, and examined system files, critics would accuse them of ignoring a serious security breach.

Decertification was the predictable response to a broken chain of custody.

The Courts Did Not Find Proof of Election Fraud

Fulton County challenged Pennsylvania officials in court, but the litigation did not establish that the 2020 election had been stolen.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court later found that Fulton County had allowed another third party to inspect voting equipment despite a court order.

The court described the county’s violation as willful and cited a pattern of bad faith conduct during the sanctions proceedings.

In 2024, a Pennsylvania court also upheld the secretary of state’s authority to direct counties not to allow unauthorized third parties to access voting machines.

The ruling recognized that equipment could be decertified when counties failed to follow those security requirements.

Again, that is not proof of voter fraud.

It is a court recognizing the state’s authority to protect certified election infrastructure.

What Real Evidence Would Require

Anyone claiming that Fulton County proves election fraud still has to prove the fraud itself.

That requires evidence answering basic questions:

Which votes were changed?
Which ballots were illegal?
Who changed or counted them?
When did it happen?
How many votes were affected?
Did those votes change the certified result?
What audit, recount, court record, or verified document proves it?

The Fulton County claim does not answer those questions.

It offers a suspicious narrative.

It does not offer proof.

Learn more about how Evidence Matters verifies political claims.

The Propaganda Pattern

This is how election misinformation repeatedly manufactures “evidence.”

It begins with a real event.

Then it adds suspicion.

It adds a technical possibility.

It assigns a political motive.

Then it jumps to the conclusion the storyteller wanted from the beginning.

Therefore, the election was stolen.

That is not how evidence works.

A possibility is not proof.

A suspicious interpretation is not proof.

A government security response is not proof of a coverup.

That is propaganda logic.

Evidence Matters Verdict

Claim: Pennsylvania decertified Fulton County voting machines because the county uncovered evidence of election fraud.

Verdict: Unsupported.

What the evidence actually shows: Fulton County allowed unauthorized third parties to access certified voting equipment and election system data. Pennsylvania officials then decertified the machines because the equipment could no longer be verified as secure for future elections.

That is a broken chain of custody.

It is not proof that the 2020 election was stolen.

Anyone who claims otherwise can submit the evidence through the $10,000 Truth Challenge.

Bottom Line

Fulton County voting machines are not the smoking gun election deniers claim they are.

This case is a lesson in why chain of custody matters.

You cannot contaminate evidence and then call the contamination proof of a coverup.

You cannot allow unauthorized outsiders to access voting systems and then accuse the state of corruption for refusing to keep using those systems.

And you cannot keep calling suspicion evidence just because it supports the conclusion you already wanted to believe.

Show the evidence.

Not the spin.

Not the suspicion.

Evidence.

Sources

How we rate claims: See the Evidence Matters Verdict System